For the first task I took my tRNA nucleic sequence and compared results of 3 different algorithms, which help predict pairs in tRNA structure.
Results are presented below:
Stem |
Results of using find_pair |
Einverted results |
Zuker algorithm results |
Acceptor stem |
5'-1-7-3'
|
7/7 |
8/7 |
T-stem |
5'-49-53-3'
|
2/5 |
4/5 |
Anticodon stem |
5'-39-43-3'
|
5/5 |
5/5 |
D-stem |
5'-10-13-3'
|
2/4 |
4/4 |
Amount of Watson-Crick base-pairs |
21 |
17 |
21 |
Einverted results: Score 72: 24/24 (100%) matches, 23 gaps 1 gccgaggta-gc----tcagtt----g-gtagagca-tgcgac---t 33 ||||||| || || | | | || || ||||| | 72 cggctcc--gcgccttag-c--ttggcgc--ct-gtgacgct-aaaa 35 |
Zuker algorithm resultsFigure 1. Structure predicted by Zuker algorithm |
Atomic protein contacts with the.. |
Polar (N, O, < 3.5Å) |
Nonpolar (P, S, C < 4.5Å) |
Total amount of contacts |
..2'-deoxyribose residues |
|
38 protein, 47 dna (38 contacts) |
45 |
..phosphoric acid residues |
|
23 protein, 10 dna (23 contacts) |
37 |
..nitrogenous bases residues (major groove) |
|
7 protein, 8 dna (10 contacts) |
18 |
..nitrogenous bases residues (minor groove) |
|
12 protein, 13 dna (12 contacts) |
20 |
Figure 2. Map of connections, part 1 |
Figure 3. Map of connections, part 1 |
Figure 5. DNA D chain and 3 amino acids. |
Figure 6. DNA E chain and 3 amino acids. |