DNA and tRNA structures

Task 1

Using 3DNA A, B and Z DNA forms were created (sequence is GATC repeated 5 times for A and B forms and GC repeated 10 times for Z form).

Task 2

Main parameters of studied DNA forms

Table 1. Main parameters of studied DNA forms
A formB formZ form
HelixRight-handedRight-handedLeft-handed
Length per turn28.03 Å33.7 Å43.5 Å
Amount of bases per turn111012
Minor groove width16.97 Å

[DC]32:B.P #638 - [DC]12:A.P #228

13.2 Å

[DC]32:B.P #638 - [DA]14:A.P #269

9.87 Å

[DG]33:B.P #657 - [DC]12:A.P #228

Major groove width7.98 Å

[DG]33:B.P #657 - [DA]2:A.P #23

17.21 Å

[DC]5:A.P #64 - [DC]33:B.P #638

16.08 Å

[DC]28:B.P #556 - [DC]12:A.P #228

Major and minor grooves

Figure 1. Thymine in DNA helix

Major groove contains C4 and O4, C5, C6, C7 atoms (of thymine). Minor groove contains N1, C2 and O2 atoms (of thymine). In Fig. 1, atoms that are located in major groove are colored red, atoms that are located in minor groove are colored blue.

Task 3

Torsion angles

Average difference of torsion angles between both strands of tRNA and A, B and Z DNA forms was calculated. It is clearly seen that studied tRNA is similar to A form of DNA.

Table 2. Torsion angles of tRNA and three main DNA forms
alphabetagammadeltaepsilonzetachi
Strand I
tRNA-26,6387,8252,2385,28-121,45-54,79-149,20
A form-36,8466,5733,9683,56-131,98-72,1-164,53
Difference with tRNA10,2121,2518,271,7110,5317,3115,33
Average difference13,52
B form-64,03671,1865,52125,45-2,12-79,19-115,975
Difference with tRNA37,4116,6413,2940,17119,3424,4033,23
Average difference40,64
Z form46,52-95,62-0,98121,13-118,3642,24-49,45
Difference with tRNA73,15183,4453,2135,853,0997,0399,75
Average difference77,93
Strand II
tRNA-46,8526,22566,1488,88-99,85-76,37-116,99
A form-41,4534,0232,8386,88-160,23-71,53-115,25
Difference with tRNA5,397,7933,31260,384,841,74
Average difference16,49
B form-61,5675,1553,475120,0156,85-72,25-118,525
Difference with tRNA14,7148,9212,6631,13156,714,121,54
Average difference38,54
Z form46,54-95,64-0,97121,13-118,3442,22-49,43
Difference with tRNA93,39121,86567,1032,2518,49118,5967,55
Average difference74,18

Hydrogen bonds in tRNA

Four stems were discovered in studied structure. Their description is given below.

Table 3.Hydrogen bonds in tRNA
Strand IStrand IIHelix
1(0.015)....>B:...2_:[..G]G----C[..C]:..71_:B<....(0.014)|
2(0.012)....>B:...3_:[..G]G----C[..C]:..70_:B<....(0.005)|
3(0.017)....>B:...4_:[..G]G----C[..C]:..69_:B<....(0.010)|
4(0.012)....>B:...5_:[..G]G----C[..C]:..68_:B<....(0.008)|
5(0.020)....>B:...6_:[..U]U----A[..A]:..67_:B<....(0.011)|
6(0.011)....>B:...7_:[..A]A----U[..U]:..66_:B<....(0.014)|
7(0.017)....>B:..49_:[..C]C----G[..G]:..65_:B<....(0.010)|
8(0.021)....>B:..50_:[..G]G----C[..C]:..64_:B<....(0.008)|
9(0.009)....>B:..51_:[..A]A----U[..U]:..63_:B<....(0.017)|
10(0.012)....>B:..52_:[..G]G----C[..C]:..62_:B<....(0.012)|
11(0.010)....>B:..53_:[..G]G----C[..C]:..61_:B<....(0.007)|
16(0.014)....>B:..39_:[..U]U----A[..A]:..31_:B<....(0.011)|
17(0.011)....>B:..40_:[..C]C----G[..G]:..30_:B<....(0.008)|
18(0.010)....>B:..41_:[..C]C----G[..G]:..29_:B<....(0.012)|
19(0.008)....>B:..42_:[..G]G----C[..C]:..28_:B<....(0.009)|
20(0.010)....>B:..43_:[..G]G----C[..C]:..27_:B<....(0.008)|
22(0.014)....>B:..10_:[..G]G----C[..C]:..25_:B<....(0.008)|
23(0.009)....>B:..11_:[..C]C----G[..G]:..24_:B<....(0.016)|
24(0.010)....>B:..12_:[..C]C----G[..G]:..23_:B<....(0.015)|

Using .out file it was discovered that studied structure contains 4 non-Watson-Crick base-pairs:

13(0.015)....>B:..55_:[..U]U-*+-G[..G]:..18_:B<....(0.014)x
15(0.018)....>B:..38_:[..U]U----U[..U]:..32_:B<....(0.019)|
21(0.012)....>B:..44_:[..C]C-*--A[..A]:..26_:B<....(0.014)|
25(0.010)....>B:..13_:[..A]A-*+-A[..A]:..45_:B<....(0.012)|

Stabilising hydrogen bonds were also determined:

12(0.009)....>B:..54_:[..U]U-*--A[..A]:..58_:B<....(0.011)|
13(0.015)....>B:..55_:[..U]U-*+-G[..G]:..18_:B<....(0.014)x
14(0.010)....>B:..37_:[..A]A-*--U[..U]:..33_:B<....(0.017)|
15(0.018)....>B:..38_:[..U]U----U[..U]:..32_:B<....(0.019)|
21(0.012)....>B:..44_:[..C]C-*--A[..A]:..26_:B<....(0.014)|
25(0.010)....>B:..13_:[..A]A-*+-A[..A]:..45_:B<....(0.012)|
26(0.013)....>B:..14_:[..A]A-*--U[..U]:...8_:B<....(0.030)|
27(0.013)....>B:..15_:[..G]G-*+-C[..C]:..48_:B<....(0.011)x
28(0.015)....>B:..19_:[..G]G----C[..C]:..56_:B<....(0.009)+

Stacking interactions

.out file were analyzed and stacking interactions were found.

   step      i1-i2        i1-j2        j1-i2        j1-j2        sum     
11 GU/AC  6.64( 3.76)  0.00( 0.00)  0.00( 0.00)  4.74( 1.88) 11.38( 5.63)
24 CA/AG  0.00( 0.00)  0.00( 0.00)  0.00( 0.00)  0.00( 0.00)  0.00( 0.00)
      

According to these lines max overlap area is 11.38 Å^2 between GU/AC residues, min is 0.00 between CA/AG pairs.

Figure 2. Stacking interactions

Excel file

Excel file containing information about torsion angles and stems.

Contacts: vorobiovarita@kodomo.fbb.msu.ru

© vorobiovarita 2018